Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Tinsley

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 10, 1981No. 42862PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SNYDER, Judge.

Appellants sought damages on an injunction bond in the trial court after a temporary injunction was set aside and dissolved by the court. The trial court dismissed appellants’ action for damages upon motion by respondents. This appeal followed in which appellants urge they stated a cause of action for recovery on the bond pursuant to Rule 92.11.

The trial court’s judgment is affirmed because the bond in question was void.

Respondents petitioned for a temporary restraining order, permanent injunctive relief, and damages arising out of appellants’ use of a trade name. After a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Oates v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  2. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts v. MastersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Jackson v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  4. J AND P TRUST v. Continental Plants Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Stadium Bank v. MiltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sunshine Realty Corp. v. KillianMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Michelle Ideker v. Harley-Davidson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  3. Buckley v. BuckleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Olsen v. SiddiqiMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API