Legal Opinion

Appeal of The A. Johnson Company (Decision and Order on Pending Motions)

Vermont Superior Court

Decided December 23, 2004No. 220-12-03 VtecPublished

1Opinion of the Court

STATE OF VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COURT Appeal of The A. Johnson } Company } } Docket No. 220-12-03 Vtec } } Decision and Order on Pending Motions Both Appellant-Applicant The A. Johnson Company, and Cross-Appellants Peter F. Langrock, Dawn Decker and Marlene Harrison, appealed from a decision of the Development Review Board (DRB) of the Town of Salisbury, granting Appellant-Applicant's conditional use application for a sand and gravel extraction operation. Appellant-Applicant appealed from Condition 13 of that decision, which imposed an impact fee as a condition of conditional use approval, and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. In Re Maple Tree PlaceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  4. Myott v. MyottSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  5. Twin Lakes Development Corp. v. Town of MonroeNew York Court of Appeals · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API