Legal Opinion

Aldrich v. Hinds

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 24, 1925No. 15152PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

LOGSDON, 0.

This is an equitable proceeding brought to establish plaintiff’s right of inheritance to an undivided one-fourth interest in the lands allotted in the name of Ellis MeGee afiter his death for the benefit of his heirs, and for an accounting for the rents and profits.

Plaintiff presents her case in the brief under the single proposition:

“That the only question to be decided in the case is whether or not the cause of action of the plaintiff in error was barred by the statute of limitations which were in fpree prior to statehood, being the seven year limitation (of Arkansas).”

O…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Heckman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Mullen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Brader v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. Howard v. ManningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. Chancey v. WhinnerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gustin v. CarshallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  2. Wirick v. NanceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Tobley v. DekinderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API