Legal Opinion
Haltiwanger v. Unisys Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 18, 1996No. Civil Action 95-1024 SSHPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.
Before the Court is defendant’s motion for summary judgment, plaintiffs opposition and defendant’s reply. Upon careful consideration of the record, defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted. Although “[findings of fact and conclusions of law are unnecessary on decisions of motions under Rules 12 or 56,” Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 52(a), the Court nonetheless sets forth its reasoning.
BACKGROUND FACTS
Plaintiff, Andrew Haltiwanger, has been employed as á clerk with the United States Postal Service (the “Postal Service”) from 1980 to the present, during which…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Boyle v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Casper Eugene Harding v. Vincent GrayCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- In Re Hawaii Federal Asbestos Cases. (Four Cases) David K. Kaiu Lillian M. Kaiu v. Raymark Industries, Inc., a Corporation, Formerly Known as Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., and Fibreboard Corporation, Formerly Known as Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Antonia Beatrix Sawyer, Individually and as Special Administratrix of the Estate of Stephen Charles Sawyer, Deceased and as Guardian Ad Litem for Andrew John Sawyer, Corrina Antonia Sawyer, and Margaret Ann Sawyer, All Minor Children v. Raymark Industries, Inc., a Corporation, Formerly Known as Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., and Fibreboard Corporation, Formerly Known as Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Toledo Monderen Maria L. Monderen v. Raymark Industries, Inc., a Corporation, Formerly Known as Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., and Fibreboard Corporation, Formerly Known as Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Ted Mina, Personal Representative for the Estate of Mariano Gamurot, Deceased Domingo Del Rosario Alice C. Digos v. Fibreboard Corporation, Formerly Known as Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation a Delaware Corporation, and Raymark Industries, Inc., a Corporation, Formerly Known as Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., Ted Mina, Personal Representative for the Estate of Mariano Gamurot, Deceased Domingo Del Rosario Alice C. Digos v. Raymark Industries, Inc., a Corporation, Formerly Known as Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., and Owens-Illinois, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ammend v. BioPort, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2004
- Najolia v. Northrop Grumman Ship Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2012
- Yeroshefsky v. Unisys Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1997
- Jorden v. Ensign-Bickford Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2000
- Lofgren v. Polaris Industries Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.