Legal Opinion
Lofgren v. Polaris Industries Inc.
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided June 23, 2021No. 3:16-cv-02811Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION CHRISTOPHER LARS LOFGREN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) NO. 3:16-cv-02811 v. ) JUDGE RICHARDSON ) POLARIS INDUSTRIES INC., ) ) Defendant. ) REDACTED MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendant has filed a motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 164, “Motion”). Plaintiff has responded. (Doc. No. 179). Defendant has replied (Doc. No. 185). The Motion is ripe for review. This unredacted version of this opinion has been filed under seal. This version of the opinion has been redacted and is suitable for the public. The Court notes…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Mortensen v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Bostock v. Clayton CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2020
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.