Legal Opinion

Outcault Advertising Co. v. Farmers & Merchants State Bank

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 7, 1922No. 22,723PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.

Action to recover upon a contract to supply defendant with advertising matter commencing June 1, 1916, and to continue for the period of two years, and for the further period of three years, unless the vendee notified the vendor to the contrary, in writing, on or before February 1, 1918. There was a verdict for the defendant and from an order denying its motion for a new trial, plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff is an Illinois corporation with its principal place of business at Chicago. The defendant is a banking corporation doing a general banking business at Greenbush, Roseau county, Minnesota. In…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Plath v. Minnesota Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
  2. Hoff v. Northwestern Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  3. Van Aernam v. WinslowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  4. Ruder v. National Council of Knights & Ladies of SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  5. Benedict v. Grand Lodge A. O. U. W.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  2. In Re Estate of DevenneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  3. Aetna Life Insurance v. CairneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API