Legal Opinion

Town of Paradise Valley v. Young Financial Services, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 20, 1993No. 1 CA-CV 91-328PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EHRLICH, Presiding Judge.

The Town of Paradise Valley, Arizona (“Town”), appeals from a jury condemnation compensation award to Young Financial Services, Inc., and Bernard Young (“Young”). For the following reasons, we affirm the judgment.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

When the Town was incorporated in 1961, all property within its boundaries was zoned residential, although non-conforming uses already present were legitimized and protected under a “grandfather clause” and the Town’s zoning code did allow a few other uses such as government buildings, churches, schools, resorts and medical…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Lombard Park District v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  3. State Ex Rel. Morrison v. Jay Six Cattle Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Campbell v. WestdahlCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  5. State v. HollisArizona Supreme Court · 1963

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. PIEDMONT TRIAD REGIONAL WATER AUTHORITY v. UngerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Daly v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API