Legal Opinion
PIEDMONT TRIAD REGIONAL WATER AUTHORITY v. Unger
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided December 17, 2002No. COA02-201PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TYSON, Judge.
I. Background
In 1984, the Guilford County Board of Commissioners (“Commissioners”) adopted its first countywide watershed protection ordinance. At the time, the following watersheds were designated: Greensboro, High Point, Jamestown, Lake Mackintosh, Reidsville, and Pole Cat Creek. In August 1985, the Commissioners designated the Randleman Dam watershed, whose boundaries included a portion of 94.11 acres of property owned by Linda H. and Wolfy Unger, (“defendants”). As of October 1985, Guilford County had also designated the Sandy Creek watershed. Of the nine watersheds so…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Winston-Salem v. SlateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Mecklenburg County v. Simply Fashion Stores, Ltd.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Nies v. Town of Emerald IsleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
- State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Buck Island, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- L&S Water Power, Inc. v. Piedmont Triad Regional Water AuthorityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.