Hiles v. Hecla Coal & Coke Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Kephart,
Appellant’s plant bordered the Monongahela River. It consisted of coke ovens, tipple, power house, repair shop, other outbuildings and a river tipple with piers from which coal was shipped in barges.
Claimant’s husband was a night watchman on the premises. His duties were to light the barges, pump water from them and keep their boilers fired; on land he was to keep fires in the office, blacksmith shop and other buildings, to guard the coke, coke ovens, buildings and defendant’s plant generally. The company supplied him with a revolver, holster, belt and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Grant Smith-Porter Ship Co. v. RohdeSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Kuca v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Millers' Indemnity Underwriters v. BraudSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Flucker v. Carnegie Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- Palko v. Taylor-Mccoy C. C. Co. (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Tappato v. Teplick & Eisenberg Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Hampers v. DarlingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Short v. Hughes Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- United Fruit Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Brandenburg v. J. Boos DairiesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.