United States v. Joseph Digregorio, Hermis Yanis, Jr., Ruben Badillo, John Delvecchio
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
COFFIN, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from convictions for conspiracy and substantive acts in violation of the Hobbs Act. 18 U.S.C.A. § 1951. All four appellants were convicted of conspiracy to obstruct interstate commerce by extortion and of the substantive act of using threats and physical beating pursuant to a plan of extortion. All but appellant Delvecchio were also convicted of obstructing interstate commerce by shooting the manager of an interstate business pursuant to a plan of extortion. 1 Some or all of appellants now raise challenges to virtually every stage of the criminal process.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- United States v. DrougasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Paul C. Porter, United States v. Walter G. Baker, United States v. Frederick L. Hearn, United States v. Larry ReservitzCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Francis E. DevinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Michael Barnett, United States of America v. Barry Jordan, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United States v. John M. Arruda, United States of America v. Edward RinglandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.