Ex parte Duque

Appellant Jose E. Duque appeals from an order denying relief that he requested in a post-conviction application for writ of habeas corpus.1 In his sole issue, Appellant contends that he was entitled to the requested habeas relief because he received ineffective assistance of counsel at the time he pleaded guilty to the third-degree felony *139offense of assault of a family member-impeding breathing.2 Specifically, he complains that his plea counsel failed to provide accurate immigration advice during the plea proceeding, as required by Padilla v. Kentucky , 559 U.S. 356, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176…