Hi-Mill Manufacturing Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
WOODS, District Judge.
This matter having come before the Court on cross-motions for partial summary judgment;
The Court having reviewed the pleadings submitted herein, and being otherwise fully informed in the matter;
The Court finds that plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment shall be, and hereby is, GRANTED; defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment shall be, and hereby is, DENIED.
I. INTRODUCTION
Before the Court are cross-motions for partial summary judgment…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Gordon Sel-Way, Inc. v. Spence Bros.Michigan Supreme Court · 1991
- Detroit Edison Co. v. Michigan Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- United States v. Rohm and Haas Company Rohm and Haas Delaware Valley, Inc. Chemical Properties, Inc. Bristol Township AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance v. Bronson Plating Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Goins v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Aerojet-General Corp. v. Transport Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- American Bumper and Manufacturing Co. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996
- Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- South MacOmb Disposal Authority v. American InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Endicott Johnson Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.