In Re Bane
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
Appellee’s contention that movant is proceeding under G.S. 28-32, notwithstanding she did not so specify, is untenable. G.S. 28-82 prescribes procedure for the removal of a particular person as administrator for causes specified therein; and, upon removal of such person, “the clerk must immediately appoint some other person to succeed in the administration of the estate.” G.S. 28-33; Harrison v. Carter, 226 N.C. 36, 36 S.E. 2d 700.
Rightly interpreted, the motion is a direct attack upon the jurisdiction of the clerk to issue letters of administration to any person. No question is raised as to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hart v. Thomasville Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Reynolds v. Lloyd Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- High v. PearceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- High v. . PearceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- In Re Sams'estateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Estate of LowtherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Sizemore v. MaroneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- King v. SnyderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- In re the Estate of HodginCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999