Legal Opinion

In Re Bane

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 10, 1958No. 670PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

Appellee’s contention that movant is proceeding under G.S. 28-32, notwithstanding she did not so specify, is untenable. G.S. 28-82 prescribes procedure for the removal of a particular person as administrator for causes specified therein; and, upon removal of such person, “the clerk must immediately appoint some other person to succeed in the administration of the estate.” G.S. 28-33; Harrison v. Carter, 226 N.C. 36, 36 S.E. 2d 700.

Rightly interpreted, the motion is a direct attack upon the jurisdiction of the clerk to issue letters of administration to any person. No question is raised as to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hart v. Thomasville Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Reynolds v. Lloyd Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  3. High v. PearceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. High v. . PearceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. In Re Sams'estateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of LowtherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Sizemore v. MaroneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. King v. SnyderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. In re the Estate of HodginCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API