Legal Opinion

Gregory Thompson, Sr. v. Daniel P. Driscoll, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Army

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided April 3, 2026No. 4:24-cv-00322Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA GREGORY THOMPSON, SR., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 24-CV-0322-CVE-MTS ) DANIEL P. DRISCOLL, in his official, ) capacity as Secretary of the Army, ) ) Defendant. ) OPINION AND ORDER Now before the Court are plaintiff Gregory Thompson’s report regarding scheduling and the nature of proceedings (Dkt. # 84), defendant Daniel Driscoll’s report as to how to proceed most efficiently (Dkt. # 85), and plaintiff’s clarification regarding defendant’s report (Dkt. # 86). Plaintiff asks the Court to enter a scheduling order in which…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Chandler v. RoudebushSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Perry v. Merit Systems Protection Bd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
  4. Timmons v. CalderaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  5. Affum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API