United States v. Carnell King
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HAMILTON, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Carnell King appeals his below-guideline sentence. Since he pled guilty and the district court’s guideline calculation was admittedly correct, it is not surprising that we affirm the sentence. We issue a precedential opinion in the case, however, because King has raised a novel argument about the relationship between the Sentencing Guidelines and the statute instructing sentencing judges on what to consider in making their decisions, 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).
The district judge did exactly what he was supposed to do in this case: calculate the correct offense level…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Beckles v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Ruslan KirilyukCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- State of Connecticut Office of Protection and Advocacy for Persons with Disabilities v. Hartford Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Gregory GreeneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Christopher JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024
- United States v. Gregory GreeneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.