Legal Opinion

United States v. Carnell King

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 30, 2017No. 16-3572PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMILTON, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Carnell King appeals his below-guideline sentence. Since he pled guilty and the district court’s guideline calculation was admittedly correct, it is not surprising that we affirm the sentence. We issue a precedential opinion in the case, however, because King has raised a novel argument about the relationship between the Sentencing Guidelines and the statute instructing sentencing judges on what to consider in making their decisions, 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

The district judge did exactly what he was supposed to do in this case: calculate the correct offense level…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Beckles v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Ruslan KirilyukCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  2. State of Connecticut Office of Protection and Advocacy for Persons with Disabilities v. Hartford Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. Gregory GreeneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  4. United States v. Christopher JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024
  5. United States v. Gregory GreeneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API