Legal Opinion
State of Connecticut Office of Protection and Advocacy for Persons with Disabilities v. Hartford Board of Education
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided September 15, 2006No. Docket No. 05-1240 CVPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
SOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judge.
This appeal raises the question of whether the Protection and Advocacy for Individuals with Mental Illness Act (“PAI-MI”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 10801-10851 (2000),1 *233the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act of 2000 (“DD Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 15001-15115 (2000), and the Protection and Advocacy of Individual Rights Act (“PAIR”), 29 U.S.C. § 794e (2000) (collectively, the “P & A Acts”) authorize plaintiffs-appellees the State of Connecticut Office of Protection and Advocacy (“OPA”) and its executive director, James McGaughey, (1) to observe and interview…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State Of Connecticut Office Of Protection And Advocacy For Persons With Disabilities v. Hartford Board Of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006