Legal Opinion

State v. Stanovich

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 20, 2007No. 6-06-10PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rogers, Presiding Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Justin J. Stanovich, appeals the judgment of the Hardin County Court of Common Pleas determining that he was ineligible for intervention in lieu of conviction. On appeal, Stanovich asserts that the trial court erred as a matter of law in finding that he was not eligible for intervention. Finding that the trial court erred by determining that Stanovich’s ineligibility for intervention on the assault counts of the indictment precluded his eligibility on the count of aggravated possession of drugs, we reverse and remand for further proceedings…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Meeks v. PapadopulosOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. SufronkoOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. State v. ShoafOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Muenchenbach v. Preble CountyOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State ex rel. Jones v. ConradOhio Supreme Court · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Perrysburg Township v. Rossford Arena Amphitheater AuthorityOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. State v. RayOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. State v. Weaver, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2018
  4. State v. ForemanOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. State v. HempfieldOhio Court of Appeals · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API