Legal Opinion
Federal Sav. and Loan Ins. Corp. v. Quinn
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided April 14, 1989No. 89 CV 98PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SAM H. BELL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (FSLIC) and Cardinal Federal Savings Bank (Cardinal) filed the complaint in this case on January 18, 1989, seeking declaratory judgment, preliminary and permanent injunctive relief and damages from defendants Robert W. Quinn and Daniel J. Gannon, former Cardinal employees. FSLIC is authorized to sue under, and bases jurisdiction on, Title 12 of the United States Code, sections 1725(c) and 1730(k)(l). See FSLIC v. Ticktin, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 1626, 104 L.Ed.2d 73 (1989), reversing, 832 F.2d 1438 (7th…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Modzelewski v. Resolution Trust Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Economou v. Physicians Weight Loss Centers of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1991
- Ernest F. Modzelewski v. Resolution Trust Corporation, as Receiver for Merabank, a Federal Savings Bank, Gene E. Rice v. Resolution Trust Corporation, as Receiver for Merabank, a Federal Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Basicomputer Corp. v. ScottDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1991
- Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation and Cardinal Federal Savings Bank v. Robert W. Quinn and Daniel J. GannonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.