Legal Opinion
State v. Yenzer
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Decided November 7, 2008No. 98,800PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Caplinger, J.:
Defendant Terri Yenzer appeals her conviction of obstruction of legal process, alleging the trial court erred in denying her motion to suppress evidence obtained pursuant to an alleged violation of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), Pub. L. 104-191, 110 Stat. 1936 (codified in various sections of 18, 29, and 42 U.S.C.) (1996). Yenzer also contends the trial court improperly enhanced her sentence without requiring her prior criminal history to be proven to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt.
Factual and procedural background
Yenzer was charged…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- State v. IvorySupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
- State v. WoolvertonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- State v. FewellSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- State v. BeckCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- State v. CarterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- In re Miguel M.New York Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. WeilertCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2010
- State of Florida v. StricklingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.