Legal Opinion
State of Florida v. Strickling
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 13, 2015No. 3D14-1668PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
The State of Florida appeals from an order granting Samuel Strickling’s motion to suppress the testimony of two of his treating physicians as well as those physicians’ medical records in this “doctor shopping” case. See § 893.13(7)(a)8, Fla. Stat. (2011). 1 We reverse that part of the order precluding all testimony from one of the physicians, Dr. Shapiro, but affirm as to that part of the order precluding the testimony of the second physician, Dr. McKnight, and excluding the medical records of both physicians.
The facts are as follows.
On November 22, 2011, Key West Police Officers…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. MilewskiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016