Davis and Davis Realty Co. v. Rodgers
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
Defendants contend that the trial court erred by refusing to grant their motions for directed verdict or judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Defendants contend that plaintiff’s testimony concerning when his commission was due is so inconsistent as to establish as a matter of law that no agreement was ever reached by the parties. For the following reasons we disagree.
The jury found that: (D a contract existed between plaintiff and either defendant whereby either defendant was to pay to the plaintiff a real estate commission on the Hall property and (2) the contract was breached…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Taylor v. WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- Broyhill v. CoppageCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Williams v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- Woods v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Murray v. MurraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Maxwell v. Michael P. Doyle, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Cannon v. DayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Hoffman v. OakleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Jernigan v. HerringCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- Howlett v. CSB, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.