Legal Opinion

Lorden v. Snell

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1931No. Civil No. 3009PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

This action was brought by Jay H. Snell for damages claimed by him to have been suffered through the negligent failure of defendant J. P. Lorden to keep and perform his part of the following contract:

“The memorandum of agreement, made and entered into, in duplicate, this 16th day of March, A. D. 1925, by and between J. P. Lorden, of Yuma County, Arizona, party of the first part, and Jay H. Snell, of the same place, party of the second part, Wit-' nesseth:
“That, whereas, the party of the first part is in the control of certain real premises in Yuma County, State of Arizona, hereinafter…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shoemaker v. AckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Meer v. CeratiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. McCready v. BullisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  4. Soule v. WeatherbyUtah Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Graham v. AsburyArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Mitchell v. CarlsonMontana Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API