Legal Opinion

BNSF Ry. Co. v. Clark

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 2019No. 95015-6PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairhurst, C.J.

¶ 1 This case involves a practice that dates back to our earliest days as a territory-the coroner's inquest. Although we now typically use experts to determine the cause of an unnatural death, historically we relied on the verdict of a coroner's inquest jury. The parties before us ask how a coroner today may invoke the statutory authority that accompanies an inquest.

¶ 2 This case arose after Thomas B. Clark, MD, the Pierce County medical examiner (ME), 1 attempted to subpoena a video held by BNSF Railway Company of a fatal train-pedestrian collision. The parties dispute both whether Dr. Clark…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Cockle v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Cockle v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. In re the Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. In Re Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. United States v. R. Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. B.O.J.Washington Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Family of Butts v. ConstantineWashington Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Matter Of A.m.s., Child Sheldon Aaron Sanders, & Sadie Johanna EngebretsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  4. Matthew D. Ferguson v. Jay WrightCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  5. State v. J.W.M.Washington Supreme Court · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API