Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. Commonwealth
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ZAPPALA, Justice.
We granted allocatur in this case to examine the sui generis issue of whether Short Week Benefits (SWB) received by Intervenors are “remuneration” for purposes of determining their status as unemployed within the definition of Section 4(u) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Act), 43 P.S. § 753(u). The Commonwealth Court (en banc) affirmed the orders of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) that in turn had reversed the referees’ decisions and granted benefits finding that SWB were not remuneration within the meaning of 43 P.S. § 753(u). We now…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Warner Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Hargenrader v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- In Re ShulerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Ludlum v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Malloch v. Maine Employment Security CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1963
3Cited by4 opinions
- Coates v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Larsen v. State Employees' Retirement SystemCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Alla v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Bucceri v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011