Taylor v. Shoop
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION CLARENCE E. TAYLOR, CASE NO. 3:21 CV 28 Petitioner, v. JUDGE JAMES R. KNEPP II WARDEN TIM SHOOP, MEMORANDUM OPINION AND Respondent. ORDER INTRODUCTION Petitioner Clarence E. Taylor filed this pro se Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under
28 U.S.C. § 2254
challenging a 2003 sentence from the Allen County Court of Common Pleas. See Doc. 1. Therein, Petitioner contends Ohio courts did not properly apply Ohio law regarding the post-release control portion of that sentence.
Id. at 14-15. He appears to ask this…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.