Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Shoop

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided June 21, 2021No. 3:21-cv-00028Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION CLARENCE E. TAYLOR, CASE NO. 3:21 CV 28 Petitioner, v. JUDGE JAMES R. KNEPP II WARDEN TIM SHOOP, MEMORANDUM OPINION AND Respondent. ORDER INTRODUCTION Petitioner Clarence E. Taylor filed this pro se Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under

28 U.S.C. § 2254

challenging a 2003 sentence from the Allen County Court of Common Pleas. See Doc. 1. Therein, Petitioner contends Ohio courts did not properly apply Ohio law regarding the post-release control portion of that sentence.

Id. at 14-15. He appears to ask this…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API