Buchart v. Ell

This was an action instituted by appellee against appellant, to recover damages for malicious prosecution. Appellee recovered judgment for seven hundred dollars.

The only error assigned which presents any question for our consideration, is that the court erred in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial.

The only reasons contained in the motion for a new trial, which are discussed by counsel for appellant, are:

3. “The verdict of the jury is contrary to law.

6. “The court erred in giving instructions on its own motion, numbered one, two, and five.

7. “The court erred in refusing to give…