Legal Opinion
Universal Drilling Co. v. Camay Drilling Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 21, 1984No. Nos. 81-2375, 81-2465PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McKAY, Circuit Judge.
' The parties to this lawsuit are “experienced, sophisticated, intelligent business[men] with vast education and experience in petroleum engineering, ... oil and gas exploration, and ... [the] makeup and operation of oil drilling rigs and equipment.” Record, vol. 5, at 2. In June 1977 they entered into negotiations for the purchase and sale of two drilling rigs referred *871to by the parties as the Marthens Rig and Rig 10.
The negotiations resulted in a contract dated July 1, 1977, and an amendment to that contract dated August 8, 1977.* Despite the dates written on the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Morrison v. GoodspeedSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937
- Union Rural Electric Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- Stuart A. JACKSON, Appellant, v. Jack OPPENHEIM, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Blankenship v. Northtown Ford, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Willis M. Duryea, Jr. v. The Third Northwestern National Bank of Minneapolis, a National Banking Association Bruce Winslow, John Doe and Mary RoeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Husband v. Colorado Mountain Cellars, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1993
- Kudon v. f.m.e. Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- In Re Sure-Snap CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- Quaker Alloy Casting Co. v. Gulfco Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
- Planning Partners International, LLC v. QED, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.