Legal Opinion

Kudon v. f.m.e. Corp.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 16, 1988No. 87-848PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRYOR, Chief Judge:

Dale A. Cooter and Carl L. Gell, on behalf of appellant, the law firm of Cooter & Gell (Cooter & Gell), brought suit against appellee, f.m.e. Corporation, d/b/a Friden Alcatel (Friden Alcatel), one of four companies in the United States authorized to manufacture postage meters, alleging tor-tious interference with contractual relations with the United States Postal Service and seeking $50,000 in compensatory damages and $1,000,000 in punitive damages. Friden Alcatel denied liability and asserted *977counterclaims for breach of contract, conversion, and writ of replevin, and…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Parsons v. Bedford, Breedlove, & RobesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  5. Day v. WoodworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1852

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Ideal Electronic Security Co. v. International Fidelity InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  2. Estate of Raleigh v. MitchellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Johnson v. Fairfax Village Condominium IV Unit Owners Ass'nDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY v. ST. ALBANS SCHOOLDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Stansel v. American Security BankDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API