City of Huntington v. Amiss
Indiana Supreme Court
From Huntington Circuit Court; Hiram Brownlee, Special Judge. Petition by the City of Huntington, against which Joseph G. Amiss and others remonstrate. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.
Appellant brought this proceeding under the act of 1891 (Acts 1891, p. 304, §§3598-3606 Burns 1901) to secure an inlet and an outlet for the drainage of said city. A demurrer to the petition was filed, which set forth as grounds therefor: (1) The court has no jurisdiction of the subject-matter of said action and petition. (2) Said petition does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. A motion to “dismiss and strike out all the proceedings” was filed by James E. Bippus and Sarah Bippus, on.the grounds: “(1) That there is no law providing for the construction of the drain as…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Osburn v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Heick v. VoightIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Poundstone v. BaldwinIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Bradley v. City of FrankfortIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Hanson v. CruseIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bemis v. Guirl Drainage Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1914
- Barton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1960
- Seybold v. RehwaldIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
- City of Huntington v. BucherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1910