Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Eller

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided May 8, 2012No. 33,519; Docket No. 30,026PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CASTILLO, Chief Judge.

{1} As personal representative of her mother’s estate, Mary Jane Hicks contacted Peter Eller, an art appraiser, to help evaluate her mother’s property. Hicks had heard one of Eller’s advertisements on the radio. Ultimately, Eller did not provide appraisal services, but he did purchase two paintings by Dunton (the Duntons) from Hicks for $4,500. Eller then sold the Duntons for $35,000 to another art dealer who sold them to an art collector from Texas for $300,000. The art collector sold the Duntons at auction for approximately $600,000. When Hicks learned about…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Matter of Adoption of DoeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Been v. O.K. Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  3. Florenzano v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Ponder v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Lohman v. Daimler-Chrysler Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. American National Property & Casualty Co. v. ClevelandNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. GandyDancer, LLC v. Rock House CGM, LLCNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Navajo Nation v. Urban Outfitters, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2013
  4. Dollens v. Wells Fargo BankNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Santa Fe Pacific Trust, Inc. v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API