Legal Opinion

Baker Food Products Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 9, 1931No. E-43Published

1DissentLittletoN, Judge

It appears to me that we would be justified in finding that the market value of the raw beef on hand at the time of cancellation of the contract in question was not in excess *597of the value per pound for which the plaintiff gave the United States credit. I am of the opinion, however, that the defendant correctly contends that since the plaintiff, instead of selling the beef in the state in which it was at the date of cancellation of the contract, retained it and converted it into sausage, steak, corned beef, and hash for domestic sale and consumption, it can not recover without showing that a…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barrett Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Harrisburg Pipe & Pipe Bending Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
  3. Wheeling Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API