Legal Opinion

Harrisburg Pipe & Pipe Bending Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 11, 1929No. E-289PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSinnott, Judge

Plaintiff herein seeks to recover the actual losses sustained by it, growing out of the cancellation of a contract, under the authority of an act of Congress approved June 15, 1917, 40 Stat. 182. The contract in question, bearing the number 2067, was entered into by plaintiff and defendant, through Josephus Daniels, Secretary of the Navy, and bore date the 19th day of September, 1918, and called for the manufacture of 800,000 4" projectiles, at the price of $7.97 *148each, 1,000 to be delivered on or before December 28, 1918, and 133,000 each month thereafter until completion.

At the time said…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Barrett Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rumsey Mfg. Corp. v. United States Hoffman MacHinery Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  2. Baker Food Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931
  3. Tyree v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API