Legal Opinion
Curtis Manufacturing Company v. Barela
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided June 13, 1966No. 7901PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOE W. WOOD, Judge, Court of Appeals.
This appeal involves the distinction between a judgment and a judgment lien, and raises issues as to res judicata and the effect of a dismissal under Rule 41(e) (§ 21-1-1(41) (e), N.M.S.A.1953).
Curtis Manufacturing Company (hereinafter called Curtis) obtained a money judgment against Barela in the Small Claims Court of Bernalillo County.
Subsequently, in Cause 70960 in the District Court of Bernalillo County, Perez sued Barela to foreclose judgment liens on real estate of Barela. Curtis was one of several defendants. In the answer of Curtis, it…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Paulos v. JanetakosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
- Porter v. Alamocitos Land & Livestock Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1925
- Salazar v. MurphyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
- Terry v. PipkinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
- Pugh v. Heating Plumbing Finance CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of Santa Fe v. VelardeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
- Mutual Building & Loan Ass'n of Las Cruces v. CollinsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
- Campos v. Brown Construction CompanyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
- Trujillo v. Acequia De ChamisalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
- State Ex Rel. Hill v. District Court of Eighth Judicial DistrictNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.