Legal Opinion
Margaret Trujillo v. Longhorn Manufacturing Company, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 1, 1982No. 81-1012PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
This appeal, after a trial to the district court, from a back pay award totalling $3,597.60 in favor of plaintiff and an assessment of plaintiffs attorney’s fees against defendant in the sum of $6,416 presents only two issues: (1) did the district court commit…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Howard Johnson Co. v. Detroit Local Joint Executive BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Slack v. HavensCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Allied Materials Corporation v. Superior Products Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- West Texas Refining & D. Co. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
- Kloberdanz v. Joy Manufacturing CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Upholsterers' International Union Pension Fund v. Artistic Furniture of PontiacCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Ronald Cobb v. Contract Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Einhorn v. M.L. Ruberton Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Noreen A. Brzozowski v. Correctional Physician Services, Inc. Prison Health Services, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Eastridge Development Company, and Cross v. Halpert Associates, Inc. And Professional Service Industries, Inc., Defendant- and CrossCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.