Legal Opinion

State v. Taylor

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 2014No. 2012-2136PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Donnell, J.

{¶ 1} The Ninth District Court of Appeals certified a conflict between its decision in this case and decisions of the Fifth District Court of Appeals in State v. Gillespie, 2012-Ohio-3485, 975 N.E.2d 492 (5th Dist.) and State v. David, 5th Dist. Licking No. 11-CA-110, 2012-Ohio-3984, 2012 WL 3776917, on the following issue: whether the defendant may benefit from the decrease in a classification and penalty of an offense enacted by the General Assembly that becomes effective after the commission of the offense but before sentencing on that offense.

{¶ 2} On July 23, 2011, Lucious Taylor stole…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. FischerOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. RushOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. RobinsonOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. BatesOhio Supreme Court · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. GwynneOhio Supreme Court · 2023
  3. State v. GwynneOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  4. State v. WhiteOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State ex rel. Clay v. Cuyahoga Cty. Med. Examiner's Office (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API