Legal Opinion

Holland v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 12, 1987No. 73511PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beasley, Judge.

Holland, the insured under a policy issued by State Farm, was injured by an uninsured motorist in March 1982. She was paid $5,000 under her PIP coverage and this litigation ensued over her claim that she had an additional $45,000 in PIP coverage. State Farm was granted a summary judgment on this issue, from which Holland appeals. Although having the earmarks, this is not an ordinary Jones/ Flewellen case, if there is such a thing. It contains, however, the procedures instituted by the insurance industry to comply with their requirements.

Holland was originally insured by State…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Flewellen v. Atlanta Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  2. Jones v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  3. Parris & Son, Inc. v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  4. Enfinger v. International Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  5. Life Ins. Co. of Va. v. ConleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Seckinger-Lee Co. v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1998
  2. Hanover Insurance v. StrigglesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API