Legal Opinion

Hanover Insurance v. Striggles

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 19, 1991No. A91A0387PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Beasley, Judge.

Bernice Striggles filed suit for retroactive optional PIP benefits against her automobile insurance carrier, Hanover Insurance Company, on the grounds that it had failed to obtain a valid written rejection of $45,000 in optional PIP coverage. Both sides moved for sum*813mary judgment on the sole issue of whether her signature on a 1978 accept/reject form effectuated a rejection of optional benefits. The trial court granted Hanover’s motion for summary judgment, concluding that the 1978 form complied with OCGA § 33-34-5 (b) as it existed prior to the 1982 amendment. On appeal, this…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Porter v. FelkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. MoweryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  3. Binns v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  4. Modern Roofing & Metal Works, Inc. v. OwenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  5. Atlanta Casualty Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Homick v. American Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API