Legal Opinion
Contreras v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided April 25, 2017No. 16 C 3495PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge Gary Feinerman
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Plaintiff Ramona Contreras filed this lawsuit under § 502(a)(1)(B) of the Employee Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B), to recover long-term disability (“LTD”) benefits under a plan that her former employer, Flexible Steel Lacing Company (“Flexco”), established through Defendant United of Omaha Life Insurance Company. Doc. 1. The parties agreed to submit this matter for judgment on the administrative record under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(a). Docs. 16, 25, 28; see Kuznowicz v. Wrigley Sales Co., 2013 WL…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gorenstein Enterprises, Inc., Sam Gorenstein, and David Gorenstein v. Quality Care-Usa, Inc. And David A. ScheinmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Diaz v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Mark Fritcher and Country Trust Bank v. Health Care Service CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Krolnik v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Donna Geiger v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jacobs v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- McNinch v. The Guardian Life Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
- Rita Fenwick v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021