Legal Opinion
Jacobs v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 30, 2023No. Civil Action No. 2021-0323Published
1Opinion of the Court
Case 1:21-cv-00323-TSC-GMH Document 22 Filed 06/06/22 Page 1 of 43 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AUSTIN JACOBS, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 21-cv-323 (TSC/GMH) RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S RECOMMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Before the undersigned are the dueling motions of Plaintiff Austin Jacobs (“Dr. Jacobs” or “Plaintiff”) and Defendant Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company (“Reliance” or “Defendant”). The key question in this case is whether Reliance properly applied a pre-existing condition…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Aetna Health Inc. v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.