Sheehan v. City of Fitchburg
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtDevens, J.
These are actions to recover the amounts severally assessed on the plaintiffs as owners oí estates abutting on Water, First and Railroad Streets in Fitchburg, as their proportional part of the charge of constructing sewers in said streets, which were paid by the plaintiffs after notice of sale of their estates, and after protest.
The plaintiff Sheehan’s and the plaintiff Harrigan’s estates abut on the street near that part of the sewer in Water Street, constructed in 1871 and 1872; the plaintiff McCarty’s estate abuts on First Street, the sewer in which was constructed in 1871 and 1872 ; that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Carr v. DooleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Bennett v. City of New BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- Ranlett v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
- Kohlhepp v. Inhabitants of West RoxburyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Carr v. DooleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
3Cited by7 opinions
- Inhabitants of Leominster v. ConantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
- Markiewicus v. Town of MethuenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Sawyer v. Manchester & Keene RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1882
- Commonwealth v. AbbottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
- Rhodes-Burford Furniture Co. v. MattoxIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.