Legal Opinion

St. Julian v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 23, 1994No. 680-93PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

MALONEY, Judge.

The trial court found Appellant guilty of two counts of burglary of a building with intent to commit theft. See TexPenal Code Ann. § 30.02(a)(1) (Vernon 1989). The court found the enhancement allegation for each count to be true and assessed punishment at confinement for twenty years on each count. The Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions. St. Julian v. State, 852 S.W.2d 592 (Tex.App. — Houston [14th Dist.] 1993). We granted Appellant’s petition for discretionary review to decide whether the unenclosed mailroom at an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  2. Day v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  3. Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1984
  4. De Albuquerque v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1986
  5. Swain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Salazar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
  2. MacK v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1996
  3. United States v. Gomez-GuerraCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  4. Aaron Lashley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
  5. Dominguez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2012

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API