Legal Opinion

Salazar v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 3, 2009No. PD-0956-08PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWomack, J.

in which MEYERS, PRICE, JOHNSON, KEASLER, HERVEY, HOLCOMB, and COCHRAN, JJ., joined.

The issue in this case is whether a habitation inherently provides notice that entry is forbidden. We hold that it does.

I. Background

Realtor Linda Pohlmeier owned the residence at 2506 South Bivins, in Amarillo. Although no one lived in the residence, Pohlmeier was in the process of remodeling it for resale. On January 29, 2007, Pohlmeier locked the doors and windows of the residence, except for one window which lacked a lock, and left the house. At 6:50 p.m., the Amarillo police dispatcher alerted officers…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  2. Blankenship v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  3. Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Jackson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1999
  5. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Rice v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  2. McKithan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
  3. Nickerson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
  4. Vincent Eric Beasley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2012
  5. Shelley Denise Munns v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2013

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API