Legal Opinion

Dominguez v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided March 29, 2012No. 03-10-00381-CRPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIANE M. HENSON, Justice.

A jury found appellant Rudy Holguin Dominguez guilty of the offense of burglary of a building with intent to commit theft. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 30.02 (West 2011). After Dominguez pleaded true to two enhancement paragraphs alleging previous felony convictions for burglary, the trial court assessed punishment at twenty years’ imprisonment. See id. § 12.425(b) (West Supp.2011) (making offense punishable as second-degree felony). 1 On appeal, Dominguez contends that (1) the evidence was insufficient to support the element of entry of a building or portion of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Clayton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  3. Mayer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
  4. Roberts v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2010
  5. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Austin Joel Trott v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2012
  2. Austin Joel Trott v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2012
  3. Eugene Hill v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2014
  4. Pablo Diego Zuazu v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2014
  5. Perren Boswell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API