Legal Opinion
Cavanagh v. Electrolux Home Products
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 18, 2012No. Civil Action No. 10-2890PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
TIMOTHY R. RICE, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiffs Charles M. Cavanagh and Roseanne Scully Cavanagh have sued Defendant Electrolux Home Products for negligence, breach of warranties, strict liability, and interference with their right of peaceful enjoyment of their real property. Electrolux now seeks summary judgment. For the following reasons, Electrolux’s motion is denied on the counts of negligence and strict liability and granted on the counts of breach of warranties and interference with plaintiffs’ right of peaceful enjoyment of their real property.1
1.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Robin Chamberlain v. Vincent C. Giampapa, M.D., Individually and Dba Plastic Surgery Center InternationaleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Atcovitz v. Gulph Mills Tennis Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Philadelphia Electric Company v. Hercules, Inc. And Gould, Inc. Appeal of Hercules, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- MacDougall v. Ford Motor Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Robin Baptiste v. Bethlehem Landfill CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- Baptiste v. Bethlehem Landfill Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Bertinelli v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- FRANCI v. CHAMBERS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- MALCOLM v. REGAL IDEAS, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.