Powell v. Mohr
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.
One Beach, whose successor in interest was one Haas, demised to one Jaus a certain apartment house under a written lease which contained a provision that the lessee was “not to sublet the whole of said premises, nor to assign or transfer this lease . . . without the written consent” of the lessor. The instrument also contained a clause reciting that “it is hereby agreed by and between the parties hereto, that in the event that the [lessee] desires to transfer this lease and the [lessor] shall fail, or refuse to give his consent to the transfer, then each party hereto shall appoint one person…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wickersham v. JohnstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Baker v. BrickellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Page v. GarverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hamblin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Williard v. CampbellMontana Supreme Court · 1932
- United Railroads of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925