Legal Opinion
Ekus v. Altmeyer
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided October 13, 1943No. 3289PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.
These are two motions for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, on the ground that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact, one motion having been brought by the plaintiff and the other, by the defendants.
Plaintiff in this action seeks to review a decision of the Social Security Board which decided that plaintiff was not a fully insured individual entitled to primary insurance benefits under the Social Security Act Amendments of 1939, 53 Stat. 1362, 42 U.S. C.A. § 401 et seq.,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Helvering v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Smietanka, Collector of Internal Revenue v. First Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Eaton v. English & Mersick Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- Smietanka v. First Trust & Sav. BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
3Cited by3 opinions
- Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare v. Marguerite B. KilbornCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Kilborn v. RibicoffDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1962
- Frantes v. CelebrezzeDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1964