Legal Opinion

Barni v. Kutner

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided October 26, 1950No. 140 & 139PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carey, J.:

The points raised can most conveniently be considered in the order followed in the briefs. For the purpose of these motions, all allegations in the complaints must be accepted as true.

The Barni Complaint(a) The breach of warranty count.

To this count defendant raises three objections: (1) lack of privity of contract between Mrs. Barni and the defendant; (2) failure to aver consideration for the warranty; (3) failure to give due and proper notice of the breach.

The first objection applies, of -course, only to- Lorraine Y. Barni. The complaint clearly shows that she was not a party to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Nashua River Paper Co. v. LindsayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  3. Jamrog v. H. L. Handy Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  4. Nye Odorless Incinerator Corp. v. FeltonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1931
  5. Pearl v. Wm. Filene's Sons Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Salmon Rivers Sportsman Camps, Inc. v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Ciociola v. Delaware Coca-Cola Bottling CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1961
  3. McLean v. AlexanderDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1978
  4. In Re Brandywine Volkswagen, Ltd.Superior Court of Delaware · 1973
  5. State v. HaleMontana Supreme Court · 1955

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API