Legal Opinion
Loo v. Loo
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 31, 1994No. CX-93-1320PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GARDEBRING, Justice.
This case arises out of a marital dissolution and concerns our holding in Karon v. Karon, 435 N.W.2d 501 (Minn.1989), that a waiver of the statutory right to move for modification of spousal maintenance, if contained in a stipulation that a trial court has incorporated in a judgment and decree of marital dissolution, is enforceable. Appellant, Thomas Loo, and respondent, Dorothy Loo, were married in 1969. On September 24,1984, prior to the Karon decision, the marriage was dissolved by a judgment and decree of dissolution. The judgment and decree incorporated a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Marriage of DeLa Rosa v. DeLa RosaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Mattson v. Underwriters at Lloyds of LondonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Marriage of Karon v. KaronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Lange v. Nelson-Ryan Flight Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Eckert v. EckertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Brown-Wilbert, Inc. v. Copeland Buhl & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Marriage of Kornberg v. KornbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Capella University, Inc. v. EXECUTIVE RISK SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANYCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Butt v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Moore v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.