Legal Opinion
H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc. v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 5, 1939No. Nos. 772, 809, 865PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Reed
These cases involve the constitutionality 'of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 19371 as applied in an order of the Secretary of Agriculture regulating the handling of milk in the Greater Boston, Massachusetts, Marketing Area.
The petitioners, H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc., and Noble’s Milk Company of No. 772 and Whiting Milk Company of No. 809, original defendants below, are engaged in handling milk in the marketing area in the current of interstate commerce or in a manner which burdens that commerce. Producers intervened as defendants, petitioner E. Frank Branon on the side of H. P. Hood…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Nu-Enamel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. David Buttrick Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1937
- United States v. Whiting Milk Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1937
- United States v. David Buttrick Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1936
3Cited by60 opinions
- H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc. v. Du MondSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Zuber v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Stark v. WickardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Lorton Blair v. Orville Freeman, Secretary of Agriculture of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.