Legal Opinion

Foxley Cattle Co. v. Bank of Mead

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1976No. 40545PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, C. J.

This case involves a garnishment action brought by the plaintiff, Foxley Cattle Company, against the St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company (hereinafter referred to as St. Paul).

Plaintiff is a judgment creditor of the defendant, Bank of Mead, having obtained a judgment in the amount of $227,850.71 against the bank. The basic facts giving rise to plaintiff’s cause of action and the resulting judgment in that case were as follows: Kenneth W. Schuette, president and a paid employee of the Bank of Mead, made certain representations to the plaintiff concerning the ownership, clear title, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ronnau v. Caravan International CorporationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  2. Foxley Cattle Co. v. Bank of MeadNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. KAMI Kountry Broadcasting Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Three Garden Village Ltd. Partnership v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  2. Reserve Ins. Co. v. General Ins. Co. of AmericaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  3. Bank of Mead v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Fern O. Anderson v. Employers Insurance of Wausau, a Corporation, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, (Intervenor Below). Robert D. Adam v. Employers Insurance of Wausau, a Corporation, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, (Intervenor Below)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  5. Jensen v. ZuernNorth Dakota Court of Appeals · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API